Russell Beck in New England In-House on noncompete agreements

The February 29, 2012, issue of New England In-House features Russell Beck addressing noncompete agreements for in-house counsel in an article called “Are New England’s in-house counsel free to join competitors?”

Many companies ask new employees to agree to restrictive covenants as a condition of employment. These restrictive covenants can take a variety of forms, including the familiar non-compete agreements and nondisclosure agreements, as well as forfeiture agreements, no-raid agreements, and assignment of inventions agreements.

Unlike most employees, however, lawyers are generally not permitted to enter into noncompete agreements. Rule 5.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct bars attorneys from entering into noncompete agreements.  However, the language in Rule 5.6 leaves open the question whether in-house counsel are always prohibited from entering into non-competition agreements.

In his article, Russell Beck refers to the American Bar Association for an answer:

Despite those questions, the American Bar Association has determined that Rule 5.6 applies not just to outside lawyers, but to in-house counsel as well.

And, as the New Jersey Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics (relying on Virginia, Illinois, Connecticut, Washington and Philadelphia bar opinions, as well as cases involving outside counsel) assayed, “the overwhelming majority of jurisdictions in the United States follow the ABA’s approach and hold that restrictive covenants affecting lawyers, whether employed by corporations or private law firms, generally violate state ethical standards.

Thus, while it is clear that attorneys, including in-house counsel, are generally not permitted to enter into noncompete agreements, one possible exception is based on the role that the in-house counsel takes in his/her new company:

In contrast, it is only when the non-compete prohibits in-house counsel from taking a purely business role that the agreement would likely be enforceable.

Thus, for example, a non-compete that prevents in-house counsel from going to a competitor as a COO would likely be enforceable.

The rationale for that exception to the exception is that the individual’s status as a lawyer is irrelevant to the role and, therefore, client choice for legal services is not at issue.

Russell Beck concludes the article with a reminder that, although in-house counsel are generally free to move about without the burdens of a noncompete agreement, they are not free from all restrictions.

So, while you are almost certainly free to move from in-house job to in-house job, and to bring legal support staff of your choosing, you are not free from all restrictions. Confidentiality and conflicts rules and certain restrictive covenants will govern your transition.

Russell Beck’s complete article appears here.

About Us

Beck Reed Riden LLP is Boston’s innovative litigation boutique. Our lawyers have years of experience at large law firms, working with clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to start-ups and individuals. We focus on business litigation and labor and employment. We are experienced litigators and counselors, helping our clients as business partners to resolve issues and develop strategies that best meet our clients’ legal and business needs – before, during, and after litigation. We’re ready to roll up our sleeves and help you. Read more about us, the types of matters we handle, and what we can do for you here.

We are widely recognized for our work handling trade secret and noncompete matters.  Russell Beck’s work in this area is well recognized; it includes:

  • Over sixteen years of working on trade secret, noncompete, and unfair competition matters
  • Authoring the book Negotiating, Drafting, and Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements and Related Restrictive Covenants (4th ed., MCLE, Inc. 2010), used by other lawyers to help them with their noncompete cases
  • Drafting and advising on the current bill pending before the Massachusetts Legislature to define, codify, and improve noncompetition law
  • Teaching Trade Secrets and Restrictive Covenants at Boston University School of Law
  • Founding and administrating the award-winning blog, Fair Competition Law

1st Circuit Decisions on Noncompete Agreements

The 1st Circuit has recently issued two noncompete decisions: Officemax, Inc. v. Levesque and EMC Corp. v Arturi. These decisions suggest the need for revisions to certain provisions in existing noncompete agreements and similar restrictive covenants. They are as follows:

  • It may no longer be sufficient to use generic successors and assigns language. The language should be made to expressly apply to the restrictive covenants.
  • In the absence of an express tolling provision, a noncompete likely cannot be enforced (for equitable relief) even if the passing of the restrictive period is caused by the former employee’s secret conduct or the court’s protracted delay.

In addition, below are two other restrictions to consider adding to nonsolicitation agreements:

  • Prohibit the employee from notifying customers of his/her new contact information, or require that any such notification be presented to you for review and approval before it is sent.
  • Prohibit the employee from accepting business (not just from soliciting business) from former customers.

About Us

Beck Reed Riden LLP is Boston’s innovative litigation boutique. Our lawyers have years of experience at large law firms, working with clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to start-ups and individuals. We focus on business litigation and labor and employment. We are experienced litigators and counselors, helping our clients as business partners to resolve issues and develop strategies that best meet our clients’ legal and business needs – before, during, and after litigation. We’re ready to roll up our sleeves and help you. Read more about us, the types of matters we handle, and what we can do for you here.

Russell Beck On Noncompete Agreements in Mass. Lawyers Weekly

Russell Beck was quoted in a recent Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly article about a lawsuit concerning the enforcement of a noncompete agreement.  The article was written by Eric T. Berkman.  A copy of the article is available here.

In the article, Russell speaks about the challenges judges face in deciding whether to enforce a noncompete agreement:

Russell Beck, … [a] Boston attorney who represents both employers and employees in non-compete litigation, agreed that such matters often come down to the “black hat-white hat” issue.

“Courts are faced with these decisions in a very short timeframe,” said Beck, who practices at Beck, Reed, Riden. “They get a bunch of briefs and affidavits, and if they have a few hours to look at everything, they’re lucky. They really have to make their decision on a gut level, and the perceived conduct of the parties sometimes has a tremendous influence on the outcome of the case, especially where there’s a bad actor in the mind of the court.”

Russell Beck frequently writes and speaks about noncompete agreements.

About Us

Beck Reed Riden LLP is Boston’s innovative litigation boutique. Our lawyers have years of experience at large law firms, working with clients ranging from Fortune 500 companies to start-ups and individuals. We focus on business litigation and labor and employment. We are experienced litigators and counselors, helping our clients as business partners to resolve issues and develop strategies that best meet our clients’ legal and business needs – before, during, and after litigation. We’re ready to roll up our sleeves and help you. Read more about us, the types of matters we handle, and what we can do for you here.

1 … 15 16 17